Web lists-archives.com

Re: documentation pages broken




I'm happy to volunteer to get this sorted, but I need access (and a
few pointers to get me started would also be useful, but I can live
without that).

The situation right now is really not reflecting well on the otherwise
excellent C++ bindings. 

Kasper

On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 20:15:49 +0000
Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks.
> 
> Sadly, there is just one person responsible for library-web, and he
> maintains it on his spare time—which has gotten considerably smaller.
> 
> I'd be tempted to suggest the *mm bindings developers to use CI to
> generate the documentation and publish it on the GitLab pages, like
> GTK does for its master branch; at least it would be *something*.
> 
> Sadly, the automated publishing of documentation from release
> tarballs is an unsolved problem: we kind of painted ourselves in the
> corner, here, by having infrastructure in place that automated
> everything to the point of not being maintained any more.
> 
> Ciao,
>  Emmanuele.
> 
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 20:05, Kasper Peeters
> <kasper.peeters@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > > Full story: the API documentation for many of the C++ bindings
> > > > at
> > > >
> > > >   https://developer.gnome.org/references
> > > >
> > > > is currently broken.
> > > >
> > > >  
> > > This is unexpected.
> > >
> > > Can you file an issue on the GitLab issue tracker for the
> > > libraries without a reference?  
> >
> > There is one already,
> >
> >   https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/library-web/issues/12
> >
> > It's a year old... No-one with sufficient access rights seems to
> > feel responsible enough to do something about it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Kasper
> >  
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list