Re: Glade architecture change
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 20:20:30 -0700
- From: Michael Torrie <torriem@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Glade architecture change
On 03/03/2017 07:16 AM, LRN wrote:
> Does this make sense? Was this already considered during previous Glade
> rewrites? If yes, why was it discarded? Thoughts?
I'm not sure GTK+'s architecture would even allow glade to operate in a
manner like you suggest.
Besides that, Glade's instability doesn't seem to have anything to do
with how the preview process displays the actual widgets.
> P.S. This proposal was not well-received on #gtk+, so there's that.
How was it presented and why was it not well received?
gtk-list mailing list