Re: Is gtk-fb still actively maintained?
- Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:34:32 +0800
- From: Woody Wu <narkewoody@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Is gtk-fb still actively maintained?
On Saturday, March 12, 2016, Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12 March 2016 at 15:07, Woody Wu <narkewoody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Does the ability of gtk can run directly on a frame buffer without X sill be
> actively developed and supported?
No, it hasn't been developed in a very, very long time. The
framebuffer backend has been removed ages ago in the 2.x series, and
it's not available on 3.x; same for the DirectFB backend.
Thanks for the info. It saved my time.
> I am hesitate to install a Xorg sever on a
> small device. Thanks.
I don't see the issue. If it can run GTK then it most definitely can run X.
Yes, it can, but need more space and memory.
[@] ebassi [@gmail.com]
Life is the only flaw in an otherwise perfect nonexistence
public key at http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371 (narkewoody@xxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list