Re: [Discuss] Make a thinner Glib/GTK+ to fit tiny device better
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:22:39 +0800
- From: cee1 <fykcee1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Discuss] Make a thinner Glib/GTK+ to fit tiny device better
2015-10-15 3:16 GMT+08:00 Matthias Clasen <matthias.clasen@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Nicolas Dufresne
> <nicolas.dufresne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Le lundi 12 octobre 2015 à 23:24 +0800, cee1 a écrit :
>> > 2. I notice EFL use some "COW" logic, but we already have a much
>> > clean implementation in GStreamer, that's
>> > gst_mini_object_make_writable. Then we may merge GstMiniObject
>> > back
>> > to glib?
>> We (taking my GStreamer hat) havent heard of any interest from the GLib
>> group for lightweight objects. Note that some library ended up also
>> having these lightweight kind of object, hence may be interesting to
>> eventually consolidate.
> I think it is fair to say that there is more interest in fixing performance
> of GObject than there is in introducing a miniobject type. Not sure if that
> qualifies as 'interest in lightweight objects' or not.
I dimly remember there was a branch for GObject performance tuning?
gtk-devel-list mailing list