Re: Dropping 'fringe' pixbuf loaders
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 23:57:44 +0200
- From: Petr Tomasek <tomasek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Dropping 'fringe' pixbuf loaders
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:28:17AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> After several rounds of fixing overflow and allocation failure issues in
> various loaders this cycle, I'm reconsidering following the suggestion in
> wbmp, tga, ras, qtif, pcx, ani... these are probably prime candidates for
> being removed.
> Before doing so, I want to ask if anybody is willing to step up and
> maintain these loaders. Note that even if we drop these from gdk-pixbuf
> itself, they can be maintained out-of-tree... one of the advantages of
> having loaders as modules.
Is it possible to add such modules as "third-party" module?
If so wouldn't it just be possible to create a github repository a move
these modules there - so that users can decide if they take the risk or
gtk-devel-list mailing list