Web lists-archives.com

Re: GMemVTable broken




Yeah, we've all been sort of aware of this for some time. I've abused
it to the fact where I know that malloc and g_new / free and g_free
will *always* be the same since a specific glib version.

I think removing all the code is fine.

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So, I just tried to use the memory profiler in glib, and I crashes
> really early because the gobject constructor (gobject_init_ctor) calls
> g_malloc before main() is reached.
>
> This means g_mem_set_vtable() is impossible to use. I don't necessarily
> think this is all that bad. Honestly we should never have made it a
> vtable (one extra vfunc per malloc...) and instead do memory profiling
> etc the "normal" way, i.e. LD_PRELOAD something with malloc
> interceptors. Maybe we should just remove all this code and keep
> g_mem_set_vtable as a dummy function that prints a deprecation warning?
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list@xxxxxxxxx
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list



-- 
  Jasper
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list