Re: Should we drop XP?
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:31:29 +0100
- From: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Should we drop XP?
On 1 April 2015 at 13:26, Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On ons, 2015-04-01 at 14:24 +0200, Emmanuel Briot wrote:
>> > Just for reference, we've already had this discussion various times:
>> > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2014-December/msg00055.html
>> > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2013-October/msg00145.html
>> Thanks for the pointers by the way.
>> I understand now that in both threads, the proposal is to drop XP support for glib.
>> Does this have any impact on gtk+ itself (it seems to me that none of the API
>> proposed in the two links above are used by gtk+) ?
>> If that's pure glib, I withdraw my comments since I only use glib through what
>> part of it is used by gtk+.
>> Other users might have different use, of course.
> Well, a future version of gtk+ may pull in a dependency on a later
> version of glib (which drops XP support)for some unrelated feature. This
> would then make it hard to use that version of Gtk+ on XP.
If we want to keep GTK+ 2.24 working on Windows XP regardless of
GLib's own support, then we could add a version check inside GTK+, or
limit the build requirements, so that application developers still
targeting Windows XP can know which versions of GLib can be used to
build for that platform.
[@] ebassi [@gmail.com]
gtk-devel-list mailing list