Re: Should we drop XP?
- Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 14:26:59 +0200
- From: Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Should we drop XP?
On ons, 2015-04-01 at 14:24 +0200, Emmanuel Briot wrote:
> > Just for reference, we've already had this discussion various times:
> > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2014-December/msg00055.html
> > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2013-October/msg00145.html
> Thanks for the pointers by the way.
> I understand now that in both threads, the proposal is to drop XP support for glib.
> Does this have any impact on gtk+ itself (it seems to me that none of the API
> proposed in the two links above are used by gtk+) ?
> If that's pure glib, I withdraw my comments since I only use glib through what
> part of it is used by gtk+.
> Other users might have different use, of course.
Well, a future version of gtk+ may pull in a dependency on a later
version of glib (which drops XP support)for some unrelated feature. This
would then make it hard to use that version of Gtk+ on XP.
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
He's an all-American Jewish barbarian who dotes on his loving old ma.
She's a virginal hypochondriac socialite descended from a line of
powerful witches. They fight crime!
gtk-devel-list mailing list