Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 21:29:35 +0100
- From: Olivier Fourdan <fourdan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
On 5 March 2015 at 20:09, Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 5 March 2015 at 19:17, Florian Müllner <fmuellner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> What about apps that rely on CSD for part of their UI? Will those have the
>>>> final word as well, or are they just screwed?
>>> The same as now without a compositor :)
> a) X11 without a compositor is a deeply uninteresting case; I'd go as
> far as saying that if you're running X11 without a compositor you're
> basically asking for a broken system
I am not sure I am following you here, but people do run WM without a
compositor, it is a reality.
And GTK supports that, at least up until now, and that's fine by me.
> b) not having a compositor is not at all equivalent to changing a UI
> from a CSD to a SSD scenario. The UI *changes*, even in drastic ways
> for the user interaction. The application has to be informed about it,
> and has to be designed with those two cases in mind. It has to ship
> with two fairly different sets of UIs. It already happens for menus,
> but you'll have to convince application developers to ship those two
> UIs, maintain them, and keep them from going out of sync. Your idea
> stops at providing a patch for a hint. You're vastly underestimating
> the effort that such hint entails on the larger ecosystem.
But it's already the case, I am not advocating to reinvent the entire
ecosystem of UI interactions here, I am merely asking if a setting to
help GTK decide to go CSD or SSD instead of just detecting the
presence of the compositor alone would be interesting...
gtk-devel-list mailing list