Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] list-objects-filter-options: error is localizeable




On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 05:21:51PM -0700, Matthew DeVore wrote:
> The "invalid filter-spec" message is user-facing and not a BUG, so make
> it localizeable.

What does it look like? Is it human-readable in its current form? I ask
because (without having looked ahead) I think you're going to move it
from a BUG to a user-facing error in a later patchset (which I don't
think the commit message reflects well). If I'm wrong, and today it's a
possibly user-facing string, then I think this patch could stand on its
own outside of this patchset, which would probably save you some effort
keeping a simple change in limbo for a long time. But if I'm right, I
think the commit message could use some work.

 - Emily

> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  list-objects-filter-options.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/list-objects-filter-options.c b/list-objects-filter-options.c
> index c0036f7378..e46ea467bc 100644
> --- a/list-objects-filter-options.c
> +++ b/list-objects-filter-options.c
> @@ -81,21 +81,21 @@ static int gently_parse_list_objects_filter(
>  		filter_options->choice = LOFC_SPARSE_PATH;
>  		filter_options->sparse_path_value = strdup(v0);
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  	/*
>  	 * Please update _git_fetch() in git-completion.bash when you
>  	 * add new filters
>  	 */
>  
>  	if (errbuf)
> -		strbuf_addf(errbuf, "invalid filter-spec '%s'", arg);
> +		strbuf_addf(errbuf, _("invalid filter-spec '%s'"), arg);
>  
>  	memset(filter_options, 0, sizeof(*filter_options));
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
>  int parse_list_objects_filter(struct list_objects_filter_options *filter_options,
>  			      const char *arg)
>  {
>  	struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
>  	if (gently_parse_list_objects_filter(filter_options, arg, &buf))
> -- 
> 2.21.0
>