Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH 3/5] sequencer: add support for multiple hooks




On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:51:56AM +0100, Phillip Wood wrote:
> On 24/04/2019 01:49, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > Add support for multiple post-rewrite hooks, both for "git commit
> > --amend" and "git rebase".
> > 
> > Additionally add support for multiple prepare-commit-msg hooks.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  builtin/am.c                       | 28 ++++++---
> 
> Having read the patch subject I was surprised to see this touching
> bulitin/am.c

I can rewrite the subject. Unfortunately, the same hook for rebase goes
through two wildly different modules, so in order to completely convert
the post-rewrite hook, I have to update both at the same time.

> > +static void run_interactive_rewrite_hook(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct string_list *hooks;
> > +	struct string_list_item *p;
> > +	struct child_process child;
> > +
> > +	hooks = find_hooks("post-rewrite");
> > +	if (!hooks)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	for_each_string_list_item(p, hooks) {
> > +		child_process_init(&child);
> > +
> > +		child.in = open(rebase_path_rewritten_list(),
> > +			O_RDONLY);
> > +		child.stdout_to_stderr = 1;
> > +		child.trace2_hook_name = "post-rewrite";
> > +		argv_array_push(&child.args, p->string);
> > +		argv_array_push(&child.args, "rebase");
> > +		if (run_command(&child))
> > +			break;
> > +	}
> > +	free_hooks(hooks);
> >  }
> 
> If you're adding a function to do this it would be nice to use it from
> am.c as well rather than duplicating essentially the same code. Is there
> any way to use a helper to run all the hooks, rather than introducing a
> similar loop everywhere where we call a hook?

It's becoming clear to me that a helper is probably going to be cleaner,
so I'll add one in for v2.

> >  void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,
> > @@ -1326,6 +1362,7 @@ static int try_to_commit(struct repository *r,
> >  	char *amend_author = NULL;
> >  	const char *hook_commit = NULL;
> >  	enum commit_msg_cleanup_mode cleanup;
> > +	struct string_list *hooks;
> >  	int res = 0;
> >  
> >  	if (parse_head(r, &current_head))
> > @@ -1369,7 +1406,10 @@ static int try_to_commit(struct repository *r,
> >  		goto out;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (find_hook("prepare-commit-msg")) {
> > +	hooks = find_hooks("prepare-commit-msg");
> > +	if (hooks) {
> > +		free_hooks(hooks);
> 
> I think you forgot to update run_prepare_commit_msg_hook(), it should
> probably be passed this list now. It might be outside the scope of this
> series but unifying this with builtin/commit.c

run_prepare_commit_msg_hook calls run_hook_le, which looks up that value
itself. It's unfortunate that we have to do it twice, but we need to
know whether we need to re-read the commit msg or not. I can explain
this further in the commit message.

> > diff --git a/t/t7505-prepare-commit-msg-hook.sh b/t/t7505-prepare-commit-msg-hook.sh
> > index ba8bd1b514..5b83f037b5 100755
> > --- a/t/t7505-prepare-commit-msg-hook.sh
> > +++ b/t/t7505-prepare-commit-msg-hook.sh
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> >  test_description='prepare-commit-msg hook'
> >  
> >  . ./test-lib.sh
> > +. "$TEST_DIRECTORY/lib-hooks.sh"
> >  
> >  test_expect_success 'set up commits for rebasing' '
> >  	test_commit root &&
> > @@ -317,4 +318,12 @@ test_expect_success C_LOCALE_OUTPUT 'with failing hook (cherry-pick)' '
> >  	test $(grep -c prepare-commit-msg actual) = 1
> >  '
> >  
> > +commit_command () {
> > +	echo "$1" >>file &&
> > +	git add file &&
> > +	git commit -m "$1"
> > +}
> > +
> > +test_multiple_hooks prepare-commit-msg commit_command
> 
> It's not clear to me that this is testing the sequencer

You're right. I need to adopt a different approach here.
-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature