Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] progress: clear previous progress update dynamically

On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 01:52:16PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote:

> diff --git a/progress.c b/progress.c
> index 842db14b72..3149ecd460 100644
> --- a/progress.c
> +++ b/progress.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static void display(struct progress *progress, uint64_t n, const char *done)
>  	const char *tp;
>  	struct strbuf *counters_sb = &progress->counters_sb;
>  	int show_update = 0;
> +	int last_count_len = counters_sb->len;

I don't think it could matter here, as these are meant to be smallish
strings, but I think we should get into the habit of using size_t
consistently to hold string lengths.

It makes auditing for integer overflow problems much simpler (this is on
my mind as I happen to be tracing some bugs around this the past few

(There are a few instances in the next patch, too. Other than this nit,
though, your series looks good to me).