Re: [GSoC] microporject test_path_is_*

[Mooga <contact@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

So for example  that is git diff

diff --git a/t/t2400-worktree-add.sh b/t/t2400-worktree-add.sh
index 286bba35d8..fc82965a0f 100755
--- a/t/t2400-worktree-add.sh
+++ b/t/t2400-worktree-add.sh
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ test_expect_success '"add" worktree' '
test_expect_success '"add" worktree with lock' '
        git rev-parse HEAD >expect &&
        git worktree add --detach --lock here-with-lock master &&
-       test -f .git/worktrees/here-with-lock/locked
+       test_path_is_file .git/worktrees/here-with-lock/locked



On 26.03.19, 23:07, "Elijah Newren" <git-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of newren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Hi,
    
    On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:10 PM Mooga <contact@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    >
    > Hi,
    > I am still a bit confused about the task itself
    >
    > it’s just text replacing for example:
    > t1400-update-ref.sh , line 194 -> `test_path_is_missing`  has to be ‘test_path_is_file’
    >
    > Thanks
    
    There are several places in the code that use test with -e or -f or -d
    (or -h or...) in order to check for the presence of a
    file/directory/symlink/etc.  For example,
       test -f path1/file1
    This could be made more clear and produce nicer error messages if it
    were instead
       test_path_is_file path1/file1
    
    There are likewise several that use one of
       ! test -e path/to/filename
    or
       ! test -f path/to/filename
    or
      test ! -f path/to/filename
    which could be replaced by
      test_path_is_missing path/to/filename
    
    This GSoC microproject is just about picking one testfile that has
    some of these constructs, and fixing the cases found within that
    testfile.