Web lists-archives.com

Re: [BUG] worktree local refs weirdness




On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 4:46 PM Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 4:38 PM Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/03/2019 15:57, Phillip Wood wrote:
> > > When it is run in a worktree 'git for-each-ref' only seems to show refs
> > > under refs/rewritten if that directory also exists under $GIT_COMMON_DIR
> > > even though they are local to the worktree.
> > >
> > > Initially I thought this was due to $GIT_COMMON_DIR pointing to a bare
> > > repo, but that is not the case. However while writing a test case which
> > > cloned to a bare repo I noticed it was listing a ref for the HEAD of a
> > > worktree in the repo I had cloned from, not the clone itself.
> >
> > Ignore that last paragraph, it's just showing the branch that got
> > created when the worktree was created. The last part of the script is
> > redundant, I've updated it below
>
> Thanks for the test script. I could reproduce it and I think I see the
> problem (update-ref creates per-worktree refs even though
> refs/rewritten should be per-repo). Working on it...

My mistake. refs/rewritten is per-worktree, but the ref iteration code
has a bug. The fix should come soon.
-- 
Duy