Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH 1/4] built-in rebase: no need to check out `onto` twice

Hi Junio

On 03/03/2019 01:35, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Thanks for explaining, it all makes sense to me now
> It would be necessary to make sure that it all makes sense to all
> future readers.  Are they patches good enough as-is for that, or do
> they need some updates before I take a look at them to pick up?

I've just re-read them and I think they're fine as is, though the first
 paragraph of the first commit message might be clearer if "HEAD was an
ancestor and" was changed to "HEAD was an ancestor of onto and".

Best Wishes