Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH ps/stash-in-c] strbuf_vinsertf: provide the correct buffer size to vsnprintf

Am 06.02.19 um 12:56 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>> Am 05.02.19 um 12:06 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
>>> The real examples are much more mundane, and very different from what you
>>> suspected, e.g. inserting the tag header before the tag message in
>>> `create_tag()` in `builtin/tag.c`. Basically, it is building up a strbuf
>>> for the sake of calling `strbuf_insert()` to insert that string elsewhere.
>> I had a look, and this example does not convince me at all. If
>> separation of concerns were applied well around the launch_editor APIs,
>> you would not need strbuf_insert() in the first place. But, alas, these
>> functions focus more on DRY, and that is often the opposite of
>> separation of concerns.
> So you actually are convinced that it is needed in this instance. Good.

I thought I said quite the opposite.

But never mind. Since I'm not going to help refactor any C code anyway
as long as the result is still C code, who am I to complain about the
existence of strbuf_vinsertf()?

-- Hannes