Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] filter-options: Expand abbreviated numbers




On 2019.01.09 13:23, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:17:09PM -0800, Josh Steadmon wrote:
> > diff --git a/list-objects-filter-options.c b/list-objects-filter-options.c
> > index 5285e7674d..9efb3e9902 100644
> > --- a/list-objects-filter-options.c
> > +++ b/list-objects-filter-options.c
> 
> > @@ -111,6 +112,21 @@ int opt_parse_list_objects_filter(const struct option *opt,
> >  	return parse_list_objects_filter(filter_options, arg);
> >  }
> >  
> > +void expand_list_objects_filter_spec(
> > +	const struct list_objects_filter_options *filter,
> > +	struct strbuf *expanded_spec)
> > +{
> > +	strbuf_init(expanded_spec, strlen(filter->filter_spec));
> > +	if (filter->choice == LOFC_BLOB_LIMIT)
> > +		strbuf_addf(expanded_spec, "blob:limit=%lu",
> > +			    filter->blob_limit_value);
> > +	else if (filter->choice == LOFC_TREE_DEPTH)
> > +		strbuf_addf(expanded_spec, "tree:%lu",
> > +			    filter->tree_exclude_depth);
> > +	else
> > +		strbuf_addstr(expanded_spec, filter->filter_spec);
> > +}
> > +
> 
> All compilers error out with something like this:
> 
>   list-objects-filter-options.c: In function
>   ‘expand_list_objects_filter_spec’:
>   list-objects-filter-options.c:124:29: error: ‘LOFC_TREE_DEPTH’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘LOFC_TREE_NONE’?
>     else if (filter->choice == LOFC_TREE_DEPTH)
>                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>                                LOFC_TREE_NONE
>   list-objects-filter-options.c:124:29: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>   list-objects-filter-options.c:126:14: error: ‘const struct list_objects_filter_options’ has no member named ‘tree_exclude_depth’
>           filter->tree_exclude_depth);
>                 ^~
>   make: *** [list-objects-filter-options.o] Error 1
> 

Hmm, looks like you may not have applied this on top of
md/list-objects-filter-by-depth? However, the most recent version of
that branch has its own compilation errors at the moment.