Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH 0/11] jk/loose-object-cache sha1/object_id fixups

On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 10:52:19AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >> Yeah, they should. I think one of them will need René's patch, which
> >> changes the body of quick_has_loose(). I can roll it as a separate topic
> >> if that's easier (or just wait a week or so until René's cleanups
> >> graduate).
> >
> > Nah, what I got is already good to work with.  Both series are
> > straight-forward and I do not expect them needing long fermentation.
> Yikes, the conflicts with sb/more-repo-in-api is quite irritating.
> I think I'll postpone the later parts of this series and ask this to
> be sent after sb/more-repo-in-api matures a bit mroe.

There were several conflicts, but it was mostly just tedious textual
fixups. I pushed the result to:

  https://github.com/peff/git.git resolve-oid-more-repo

But I'm happy to wait and rebase if sb/more-repo-in-api is close to