Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH 0/11] jk/loose-object-cache sha1/object_id fixups

Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Yeah, they should. I think one of them will need René's patch, which
>> changes the body of quick_has_loose(). I can roll it as a separate topic
>> if that's easier (or just wait a week or so until René's cleanups
>> graduate).
> Nah, what I got is already good to work with.  Both series are
> straight-forward and I do not expect them needing long fermentation.

Yikes, the conflicts with sb/more-repo-in-api is quite irritating.
I think I'll postpone the later parts of this series and ask this to
be sent after sb/more-repo-in-api matures a bit mroe.