Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve documentation on UTF-16

On Thu, Dec 27 2018, brian m. carlson wrote:

> We've recently fielded several reports from unhappy Windows users about
> our handling of UTF-16, UTF-16LE, and UTF-16BE, none of which seem to be
> suitable for certain Windows programs.

Just for context, is "we" here $DAYJOB or a reference to some previous
ML thread(s) on this list, or something else?