Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH v11 00/22] Convert "git stash" to C builtin

Hi Junio,

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >> Thanks for your work on this!  I have read through the range-diff and
> >> the new patch of this last round, and this addresses all the comments
> >> I had on v10 (and some more :)).  I consider it
> >> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > One thing that bothers me is that this seems to have been rebased on
> > 'master', but as long as we are rebasing, the updated series must
> > also take into account of the sd/stash-wo-user-name topic, i.e. if
> > we are rebasing it, it should be rebased on top of the result of
> >
> > 	git checkout -B ps/rebase-in-c master
> > 	git merge --no-ff sd/stash-wo-user-name
> >
> > I think.
> https://travis-ci.org/git/git/builds/459619672 would show that this
> C reimplementation now regresses from the scripted version due to
> lack of such rebasing (i.e. porting a correction from scripted one).

Oh, you know, at first I *mis-read* your mail to mean "don't you rebase
all the time!", but in this case (in contrast to earlier statements about
rebasing between iterations of patch series), you *do* want Paul to

Let me see what I can come up with in my `git-stash` branch on