Re: insteadOf and git-request-pull output
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 07:54:32PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > I think that if we use the "principle of least surprise," insteadOf
> > rules shouldn't be applied for git-request-pull URLs.
> I haven't used request-pull so I don't have much of an opinion on this,
> but do you think the same applies to 'git remote get-url <remote>'?
> I.e. should it also show the original unmunged URL, or the munged one as
> it does now?
I don't know, maybe both? As opposed to git-request-pull, this is not
exposing the insteadOf URL to someone other than the person who set it
up, so even if it does return the munged URL, it wouldn't be unexpected.