Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH 2/2] t/t7510-signed-commit.sh: add signing subkey to Eris Discordia key




On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 10:47:10AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> diff --git a/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh b/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh
> index e8377286d..86d3f93fa 100755
> --- a/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh
> +++ b/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh
> @@ -197,9 +197,9 @@ test_expect_success GPG 'show bad signature with custom format' '
>  test_expect_success GPG 'show untrusted signature with custom format' '
>  	cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
>  	U
> -	61092E85B7227189
> +	65A0EEA02E30CAD7
>  	Eris Discordia <discord@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> -	D4BE22311AD3131E5EDA29A461092E85B7227189
> +	F8364A59E07FFE9F4D63005A65A0EEA02E30CAD7
>  	D4BE22311AD3131E5EDA29A461092E85B7227189
>  	EOF
>  	git log -1 --format="%G?%n%GK%n%GS%n%GF%n%GP" eighth-signed-alt >actual &&
> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ test_expect_success GPG 'show untrusted signature with custom format' '
>  test_expect_success GPG 'show unknown signature with custom format' '
>  	cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
>  	E
> -	61092E85B7227189
> +	65A0EEA02E30CAD7

It's my understanding that GnuPG will use the most recent subkey
suitable for a particular purpose, and I think the test relies on that
behavior.  However, I'm not sure that's documented.  Do we want to rely
on that behavior or be more explicit?  (This is a question, not an
opinion.)
-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature