ab/* topics (was: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2018, #01; Thu, 1))
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 12:02:01 +0100
- From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: ab/* topics (was: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2018, #01; Thu, 1))
On Thu, Nov 01 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * ab/push-dwim-dst (2018-10-29) 9 commits
> - SQUASH???
> - push doc: document the DWYM behavior pushing to unqualified <dst>
> - push: add DWYM support for "git push refs/remotes/...:<dst>"
> - push: test that <src> doesn't DWYM if <dst> is unqualified
> - push: add an advice on unqualified <dst> push
> - push: move unqualified refname error into a function
> - push: improve the error shown on unqualified <dst> push
> - i18n: remote.c: mark error(...) messages for translation
> - remote.c: add braces in anticipation of a follow-up change
> "git push $there $src:$dst" rejects when $dst is not a fully
> qualified refname and not clear what the end user meant. The
> codepath has been taught to give a clearer error message, and also
> guess where the push should go by taking the type of the pushed
> object into account (e.g. a tag object would want to go under
> The last few steps are questionable.
> cf. <87in1lkw54.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Will send an update to this soon.
> * ab/pack-tests-cleanup (2018-10-31) 3 commits
> - index-pack tests: don't leave test repo dirty at end
> - pack-objects tests: don't leave test .git corrupt at end
> - pack-objects test: modernize style
> A couple of tests used to leave the repository in a state that is
> deliberately corrupt, which have been corrected.
> Will merge to 'next'.
> * ab/reject-alias-loop (2018-10-19) 1 commit
> (merged to 'next' on 2018-10-26 at bc213f1bef)
> + alias: detect loops in mixed execution mode
> Two (or more) aliases that mutually refer to each other can form an
> infinite loop; we now attempt to notice and stop.
> Reverted out of 'next'.
> cf. <87sh0slvxm.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*nod* will try to find time to work on this soon, but treating it as
Could you please pick up
It seems to have fallen between the cracks and addressed the feedback on
v1, and looks good to me (and nobody's objected so far...).