Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH 2/3] ls-remote: release memory instead of UNLEAK




Olga Telezhnaya <olyatelezhnaya@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Use ref_array_clear() to release memory instead of UNLEAK macros.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olga Telezhnaia <olyatelezhnaya@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  builtin/ls-remote.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

OK, this is immediately before the command exits, and we have a way
to clear and release the resource, so it is obvious we should use
it.

Good.


>
> diff --git a/builtin/ls-remote.c b/builtin/ls-remote.c
> index 1a25df7ee15b4..6a0cdec30d2d7 100644
> --- a/builtin/ls-remote.c
> +++ b/builtin/ls-remote.c
> @@ -151,6 +151,6 @@ int cmd_ls_remote(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  	}
>  
>  	UNLEAK(sorting);
> -	UNLEAK(ref_array);
> +	ref_array_clear(&ref_array);
>  	return status;
>  }
>
> --
> https://github.com/git/git/pull/538