Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH] unpack-trees: allow missing CE_SKIP_WORKTREE objs




Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> @@ -1635,6 +1635,7 @@ int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_options
>  				o->result.cache_tree = cache_tree();
>  			if (!cache_tree_fully_valid(o->result.cache_tree))
>  				cache_tree_update(&o->result,
> +						  WRITE_TREE_SKIP_WORKTREE_MISSING_OK |
>  						  WRITE_TREE_SILENT |
>  						  WRITE_TREE_REPAIR);
>  		}

Hmmmm.  Should this be passing the bit unconditionally?  Shouldn't
it be set only when we are doing lazy clone?  A non-lazy clone that
merely uses sparse checkout has nowhere else to turn to if it loses
a blob object that currently is not necessary to complete a checkout,
unlike a repository with promisor.