Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] gpg-interface t: extend the existing GPG tests with GPGSM




Am Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:12:57 -0700
schrieb Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>:

> Henning Schild <henning.schild@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Add test cases to cover the new X509/gpgsm support. Most of them
> > resemble existing ones. They just switch the format to x509 and set
> > the signingkey when creating signatures. Validation of signatures
> > does not need any configuration of git, it does need gpgsm to be
> > configured to trust the key(-chain).
> > We generate a self-signed key for committer@xxxxxxxxxxx and
> > configure gpgsm to trust it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Henning Schild <henning.schild@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  t/lib-gpg.sh               |  9 ++++++-
> >  t/lib-gpg/gpgsm-gen-key.in |  6 +++++
> >  t/t4202-log.sh             | 66
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > t/t5534-push-signed.sh     | 52
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7003-filter-branch.sh   |
> > 15 +++++++++++ t/t7030-verify-tag.sh      | 47
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- t/t7600-merge.sh           | 31
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 3
> > deletions(-) create mode 100644 t/lib-gpg/gpgsm-gen-key.in  
> 
> I saw my post-integration tests taking forever to finish for 'pu'
> and "ps x" output showed that many tests (I ran tests in parallel)
> were stuck and all of them were running gpgsm. 
> 
> For now, I've ejected the topic out of 'pu', as I want to finish
> today's integration run with all the other topics first before
> coming back to this topic.

That must have been the key generation, see my reply to one of
Jeffs mails.

Henning