Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH 1/8] builtin/receive-pack: use check_signature from gpg-interface




Henning Schild <henning.schild@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I think 1 and 2 can be seen as somewhat unrelated to the gpgsm feature,
> they are more general refactoring. So i think picking them is a good
> idea. It will make the series shorter and ease review in the next round.

Surely, resending from patch 3 and upwards labelled as "add support
for gpgsm", saying that the topic depends on a different topic
branch named $X in my tree (after $X actually gets pushed out,
preferrably as part of 'next'---which is a promise that the changes
won't see any more drastic rewrites), is a good approach.

Thanks.