Re: What's (not) cooking
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 00:54:45 +0200
- From: Kim Gybels <kgybels@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: What's (not) cooking
On (07/07/18 08:34), Elijah Newren wrote:
> Hi Dscho,
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 5:11 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Elijah,
> > On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Elijah Newren wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > I'll be pushing out the integration branches with some updates, but
> >> > there is no change in 'next' and below. The following topics I gave
> >> > a quick look and gave them topic branches, but I had trouble merging
> >> > them in 'pu' and making them work correctly or pass the tests, so
> >> > they are not part of 'pu' in today's pushout.
> >> >
> >> > pk/rebase-in-c
> >> > en/dirty-merge-fixes
> >> > en/t6036-merge-recursive-tests
> >> > en/t6042-insane-merge-rename-testcases
> >> > ds/multi-pack-index
> >> It looks to me like the main problem is that pu itself has lots of
> >> test failures. It seems to bisect down to
> >> kg/gc-auto-windows-workaround. If I revert commit ac9d3fdbebbd ("gc
> >> --auto: clear repository before auto packing", 2018-07-04), then pu
> >> passes tests again for me.
> > Is this the segmentation fault about which I just sent a mail?
> Yes, this is is a gc segfault issue. It looks like every test calling
> git gc will fail because of it, I even saw a "nothing to pack" message
> or something like that followed by a segfault.
Sorry, I forgot to run the tests for v2 of my patch. I'll be more
careful in the future.