Re: [PATCH] ls-tree: make <tree-ish> optional
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:38:32 -0400
- From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] ls-tree: make <tree-ish> optional
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:05 PM Joshua Nelson <jyn514@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is it customary to send a new patch or second patch that builds on the
It depends what you mean. If there were problems with a version of a
patch you sent, then you "re-roll", which means you re-send the patch
in its entirety as if it's brand new (not building on the problematic
previous version). You'd also indicate the attempt number in the
subject; for instance "[PATCH v2]" for the second attempt.
If you're working on some functionality that is built up over a series
steps, then you would send all those patches as a "patch series", in
which each patch in the series builds upon the patch or patches
preceding it in the series.
> If I specify a commit range to git-send-email it sends both, not
> just the latest.
I'm not quite sure what you mean.