Re: Implementing reftable in Git
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:55:11 -0700
- From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Implementing reftable in Git
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Stefan Beller wrote:
>> * We *might* be able to use reftables in negotiation later
>> ("client: Last I fetched, you said your latest transaction
>> number was '5' with the hash over all refs to be <sha1>;
>> server: ok, here are the refs and the pack, you're welcome").
> Do you mean that reftable's reflog layout makes this easier?
> It's not clear to me why this wouldn't work with the current
Because of D/F conflicts we may not know all remote refs
(and their ref logs), such that "the hash over all refs" on the remote
is error prone to compute. Without transaction numbers it is also
cumbersome for the server to remember the state.
We could try it based on the current refs, but I'd think
it is not easy to do, whereas reftables bring some subtle
advantages that allow for such easier negotiation.
>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Christian Couder
>> <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> During the last Git Merge conference last March Stefan talked about
>>> reftable. In Alex Vandiver's notes  it is asked that people
>>> announce it on the list when they start working on it,
>> Mostly because many parties want to see it implemnented
>> and were not sure when they could start implementing it.
> And to coordinate / help each other!
Yes. Usually open source contributions are so sparse, that
just doing it and then sending it to the mailing list does not
produce contention or conflict (double work), but this seemed
like a race condition waiting to happen. ;)
>> With that said, please implement it in a way that it can not just be used as
>> a refs backend, but can easily be re-used to write ref advertisements
>> onto the wire?
> Can you spell this out a little more for me? At first glance it's not
> obvious to me how knowing about this potential use would affect the
> initial code.
Yeah me neither. I just want to make Christian aware of the potential
use cases, that come afterwards, so it can influence his design decisions
for the implementation.