Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH 8/8] gpg-interface: handle alternative signature types




On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 04:24:27AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> How confident are we that _all_ possible signing programs will conform
> to the "-----BEGIN %s-----" pattern? If we're not confident, then
> perhaps the user should be providing the full string here, not just
> the '%s' part?

This is not likely to be true of other signing schemes.  In fact, other
than OpenPGP, PEM, and CMS (S/MIME), this is probably not true at all.
I know OpenBSD's signify has no wrappers (except a mandatory "untrusted
comment:" line at the beginning).  There wouldn't be a way to match such
a signature unless we implemented prefix or regex support.

It's currently possible to hack other signatures in with wrappers if
they wrap the actual signature in OpenPGP-like armor; someone (I believe
Eric Wong) has gotten this to work with signify.  I only mention signify
because other than OpenPGP and CMS, it's the only scheme I've seen
people use with Git.
-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature