Web lists-archives.com

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2018, #02; Tue, 6)

Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>>  Is this ready for 'next'?
> I am not aware of any open questions or issues. You thought out loud
> about how the series was structured, in particular about introducing a
> successful test, then redefining it, as opposed to introducing it as a
> failing test, then making it succeed. I hope I managed to motivate my
> choice better in v2 (which is what you have picked up).
> Duy wondered if it was sane to use a pager when we know that we are
> "--get"-ing at most one config item. In v2, I addressed this by turning
> on paging for a more careful selection of "--get"-ters.

Yeah, I am aware of these exchanges, and they are resolved nicely, I
think.  I was mostly asking if other people have concerns we haven't
thought of yet.

Let's merge this to 'next', then.