Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH v9 4/8] utf8: add function to detect a missing UTF-16/32 BOM

> On 06 Mar 2018, at 23:53, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> Also "UTF16" or other spelling
>>> the platform may support but this code fails to recognise will go
>>> unchecked.
>> That is true. However, I would assume all iconv implementations use the
>> same encoding names for UTF encodings, no? That means UTF16 would never be
>> valid. Would you agree?
> After seeing "UTF16" and others in "iconv -l | grep -i utf" output,
> I am not sure what you mean by "Would you agree?"  People can say in
> their .gitattributes file that this path is in "UTF16" without dash
> and that is what will be fed to this coe, no?

On macOS I don't see UTF16... but I just checked on my Linux box and
there it is. Consequently, we need to check both versions: with and
without dash.

I'll reroll ASAP (I try to do it first thing in the morning).