Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH 4/8] Doc/gitsubmodules: avoid abbreviations




On Wednesday 10 January 2018 12:56 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Kaartic Sivaraam
> <kaartic.sivaraam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 09 January 2018 12:15 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>>>
>>>> - * The command line for those commands that support taking submodule specs.
>>>
>>> ++ The command line for those commands that support taking submodules
>>> as part of their pathspecs[1].
>>> ++
>>> ++[1] pathspec is an official term according to `man gitglossary`.
>>>
>>> Maybe?
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, I actually did think 'specification' wasn't a the best fit for
>> this (should have mentioned that somewhere) Now, the real term came out :)
>>
>> Just to be sure, that "[1] pathspec ..." part goes to the end of the
>> document doesn't it?
> 
> The [1] part was just to highlight it for the sake of this discussion;
> I would not include it into the man page.
> 

That '++' before it made me think otherwise :)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature