Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH 4/8] Doc/gitsubmodules: avoid abbreviations




On Tuesday 09 January 2018 12:15 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>
>> - * The command line for those commands that support taking submodule specs.
> 
> ++ The command line for those commands that support taking submodules
> as part of their pathspecs[1].
> ++
> ++[1] pathspec is an official term according to `man gitglossary`.
> 
> Maybe?
> 

Yeah, I actually did think 'specification' wasn't a the best fit for
this (should have mentioned that somewhere) Now, the real term came out :)

Just to be sure, that "[1] pathspec ..." part goes to the end of the
document doesn't it?


>> -   Most commands have a boolean flag '--recurse-submodules' whether to
>> -   recurse into submodules. Examples are `ls-files` or `checkout`.
>> + * The command line for those commands that support taking submodule
>> +   specifications. Most commands have a boolean flag '--recurse-submodules
>> +   whether to recurse into submodules. Examples are `ls-files` or `checkout`.
>>     Some commands take enums, such as `fetch` and `push`, where you can
>>     specify how submodules are affected.
>>
>> --
>> 2.16.0.rc0.223.g4a4ac8367
>>


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature