Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] convert_to_git(): safe_crlf/checksafe becomes int conv_flags

Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Nice catch. I'll fix that in the next iteration.
> Is it OK if I send the next iteration soon or would you prefer
> it if I wait until after 2.16 release?
> Plus, is it ok to keep the base of the series or would you prefer
> it if I rebase it to the latest master (because of a minor conflict)?

I do not see this topic as a fix for grave bug that needs to go to
older maintenance track---it is rather a new feature, isn't it?  So
a rebased series that cleanly applies on top of 2.16 final would be
a reasonable way to go forward.