Re: [PATCH v3] bisect: mention "view" as an alternative to "visualize"
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 14:55:56 +0900
- From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] bisect: mention "view" as an alternative to "visualize"
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> To see the currently remaining suspects in 'gitk', issue the following
> -command during the bisection process:
> +command during the bisection process (the subcommand `view` can, in all
> +cases, be used as an alternative to `visualize`):
I'd drop ", in all cases," if I were writing this.
If it were very common that some "synonyms" are only usable in
certain limited cases, singling this out and explicitly saying that
"'view', unlike many other 'synonyms', is truly a synonym to
visualize in all cases" would make sense and would help readers, but
I do not think that is the case. An alternative by definition
should be usable "in all cases", so I do not think the phrase helps
the readers at all.
> diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
> index fdd984d34..52f68c922 100644
> --- a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
> +++ b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
> @@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ _git_bisect ()
> __git_has_doubledash && return
> - local subcommands="start bad good skip reset visualize replay log run"
> + local subcommands="start bad good skip reset visualize view replay log run"
This change makes the end user experience a lot worse, I am afraid.
People used to be able to say "bisect vi<TAB>" and I'd imagine that
many are used to type exactly that. Now they get two choices and
have to say 's' (or 'e') before hitting another <TAB>.