Web lists-archives.com

Re: should "git bisect" support "git bisect next?"

On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 11:38:23PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thanks for saving me time to explain why 'next' is still a very
> important command but the end users do not actually need to be
> strongly aware of it, because most commands automatically invokes it
> as their final step due to the importance of what it does ;-)

This reminds me; is there a way to suppress it because I'm about to
give a large set of good and bit commits (perhaps because I'm
replaying part of a git biset log, minus one or two lines that are
suspected of being bogus thanks to flaky reproduction), and so there's
no point having git bisect figure the "next" commit to try until I'm
done giving it a list of good/bad commits?

	     	       	      	 	  - Ted