Web lists-archives.com

"git bisect" takes exactly one bad commit and one or more good?

  more on "git bisect" ... the man page seems to make it clear that
bisection takes *precisely* one "bad" commit, and one *or more* good
commits, is that correct? seems that way, given the ellipses in the
commands below:

  git bisect start [--term-{old,good}=<term> --term-{new,bad}=<term>]
                   [--no-checkout] [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<paths>...]
  git bisect (bad|new|<term-new>) [<rev>]
  git bisect (good|old|<term-old>) [<rev>...]

however, other parts of the man page seem less clear. just below
that, a description that bisection takes "a" good commit:

"You use it by first telling it a "bad" commit that is known to
contain the bug, and a "good" commit that is known to be before the
bug was introduced."

and a bit lower, we read "at least one bad ...", which some people
might interpret as one or more *bad* commits:

"Once you have specified at least one bad and one good commit, git
bisect selects a commit in the middle of that range of history, checks
it out, and outputs something similar to the following:"

  if the rules are exactly one bad commit and one or more good, i'll
submit a patch to reword at least the above, and possibly more if



Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday