Web lists-archives.com

[PATCH 09/30] directory rename detection: testcases checking which side did the rename




Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh | 283 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 283 insertions(+)

diff --git a/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh b/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh
index d15153c652..157299105f 100755
--- a/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh
+++ b/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh
@@ -1053,4 +1053,287 @@ test_expect_failure '5d-check: Directory/file/file conflict due to directory ren
 #   back to old handling.  But, sadly, see testcases 8a and 8b.
 ###########################################################################
 
+
+###########################################################################
+# SECTION 6: Same side of the merge was the one that did the rename
+#
+# It may sound obvious that you only want to apply implicit directory
+# renames to directories if the _other_ side of history did the renaming.
+# If you did make an implementation that didn't explicitly enforce this
+# rule, the majority of cases that would fall under this section would
+# also be solved by following the rules from the above sections.  But
+# there are still a few that stick out, so this section covers them just
+# to make sure we also get them right.
+###########################################################################
+
+# Testcase 6a, Tricky rename/delete
+#   Commit A: z/{b,c,d}
+#   Commit B: z/b
+#   Commit C: y/{b,c}, z/d
+#   Expected: y/b, CONFLICT(rename/delete, z/c -> y/c vs. NULL)
+#   Note: We're just checking here that the rename of z/b and z/c to put
+#         them under y/ doesn't accidentally catch z/d and make it look like
+#         it is also involved in a rename/delete conflict.
+
+test_expect_success '6a-setup: Tricky rename/delete' '
+	git rm -rf . &&
+	git clean -fdqx &&
+	rm -rf .git &&
+	git init &&
+
+	mkdir z &&
+	echo b >z/b &&
+	echo c >z/c &&
+	echo d >z/d &&
+	git add z &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit -m "A" &&
+
+	git branch A &&
+	git branch B &&
+	git branch C &&
+
+	git checkout B &&
+	git rm z/c &&
+	git rm z/d &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit -m "B" &&
+
+	git checkout C &&
+	mkdir y &&
+	git mv z/b y/ &&
+	git mv z/c y/ &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit -m "C"
+'
+
+test_expect_success '6a-check: Tricky rename/delete' '
+	git checkout B^0 &&
+
+	test_must_fail git merge -s recursive C^0 >out &&
+	test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/delete).*z/c.*y/c" out &&
+
+	test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+	test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+	test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+	test $(git rev-parse :0:y/b) = $(git rev-parse A:z/b) &&
+	test $(git rev-parse :3:y/c) = $(git rev-parse A:z/c)
+'
+
+# Testcase 6b, Same rename done on both sides
+#   (Related to testcases 6c and 8e)
+#   Commit A: z/{b,c}
+#   Commit B: y/{b,c}
+#   Commit C: y/{b,c}, z/d
+#   Note: If we did directory rename detection here, we'd move z/d into y/,
+#         but C did that rename and still decided to put the file into z/,
+#         so we probably shouldn't apply directory rename detection for it.
+
+test_expect_success '6b-setup: Same rename done on both sides' '
+	git rm -rf . &&
+	git clean -fdqx &&
+	rm -rf .git &&
+	git init &&
+
+	mkdir z &&
+	echo b >z/b &&
+	echo c >z/c &&
+	git add z &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit -m "A" &&
+
+	git branch A &&
+	git branch B &&
+	git branch C &&
+
+	git checkout B &&
+	git mv z y &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit -m "B" &&
+
+	git checkout C &&
+	git mv z y &&
+	mkdir z &&
+	echo d >z/d &&
+	git add z/d &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit -m "C"
+'
+
+test_expect_success '6b-check: Same rename done on both sides' '
+	git checkout B^0 &&
+
+	git merge -s recursive C^0 &&
+
+	test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+	test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+	test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+	test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/b) = $(git rev-parse A:z/b) &&
+	test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/c) = $(git rev-parse A:z/c) &&
+	test $(git rev-parse HEAD:z/d) = $(git rev-parse C:z/d)
+'
+
+# Testcase 6c, Rename only done on same side
+#   (Related to testcases 6b and 8e)
+#   Commit A: z/{b,c}
+#   Commit B: z/{b,c} (no change)
+#   Commit C: y/{b,c}, z/d
+#   Expected: y/{b,c}, z/d
+#   NOTE: Seems obvious, but just checking that the implementation doesn't
+#         "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c,d}.
+
+test_expect_success '6c-setup: Rename only done on same side' '
+	git rm -rf . &&
+	git clean -fdqx &&
+	rm -rf .git &&
+	git init &&
+
+	mkdir z &&
+	echo b >z/b &&
+	echo c >z/c &&
+	git add z &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit -m "A" &&
+
+	git branch A &&
+	git branch B &&
+	git branch C &&
+
+	git checkout B &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit --allow-empty -m "B" &&
+
+	git checkout C &&
+	git mv z y &&
+	mkdir z &&
+	echo d >z/d &&
+	git add z/d &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit -m "C"
+'
+
+test_expect_success '6c-check: Rename only done on same side' '
+	git checkout B^0 &&
+
+	git merge -s recursive C^0 &&
+
+	test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+	test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+	test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+	test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/b) = $(git rev-parse A:z/b) &&
+	test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/c) = $(git rev-parse A:z/c) &&
+	test $(git rev-parse HEAD:z/d) = $(git rev-parse C:z/d)
+'
+
+# Testcase 6d, We don't always want transitive renaming
+#   (Related to testcase 1c)
+#   Commit A: z/{b,c}, x/d
+#   Commit B: z/{b,c}, x/d (no change)
+#   Commit C: y/{b,c}, z/d
+#   Expected: y/{b,c}, z/d
+#   NOTE: Again, this seems obvious but just checking that the implementation
+#         doesn't "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c,d}.
+
+test_expect_success '6d-setup: We do not always want transitive renaming' '
+	git rm -rf . &&
+	git clean -fdqx &&
+	rm -rf .git &&
+	git init &&
+
+	mkdir z &&
+	echo b >z/b &&
+	echo c >z/c &&
+	mkdir x &&
+	echo d >x/d &&
+	git add z x &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit -m "A" &&
+
+	git branch A &&
+	git branch B &&
+	git branch C &&
+
+	git checkout B &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit --allow-empty -m "B" &&
+
+	git checkout C &&
+	git mv z y &&
+	git mv x z &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit -m "C"
+'
+
+test_expect_success '6d-check: We do not always want transitive renaming' '
+	git checkout B^0 &&
+
+	git merge -s recursive C^0 &&
+
+	test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+	test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+	test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+	test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/b) = $(git rev-parse A:z/b) &&
+	test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/c) = $(git rev-parse A:z/c) &&
+	test $(git rev-parse HEAD:z/d) = $(git rev-parse A:x/d)
+'
+
+# Testcase 6e, Add/add from one-side
+#   Commit A: z/{b,c}
+#   Commit B: z/{b,c} (no change)
+#   Commit C: y/{b,c,d_1}, z/d_2
+#   Expected: y/{b,c,d_1}, z/d_2
+#   NOTE: Again, this seems obvious but just checking that the implementation
+#         doesn't "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c} +
+#         add/add conflict on y/d_1 vs y/d_2.
+
+test_expect_success '6e-setup: Add/add from one side' '
+	git rm -rf . &&
+	git clean -fdqx &&
+	rm -rf .git &&
+	git init &&
+
+	mkdir z &&
+	echo b >z/b &&
+	echo c >z/c &&
+	git add z &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit -m "A" &&
+
+	git branch A &&
+	git branch B &&
+	git branch C &&
+
+	git checkout B &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit --allow-empty -m "B" &&
+
+	git checkout C &&
+	git mv z y &&
+	echo d1 > y/d &&
+	mkdir z &&
+	echo d2 > z/d &&
+	git add y/d z/d &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git commit -m "C"
+'
+
+test_expect_success '6e-check: Add/add from one side' '
+	git checkout B^0 &&
+
+	git merge -s recursive C^0 &&
+
+	test 4 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+	test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+	test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+	test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/b) = $(git rev-parse A:z/b) &&
+	test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/c) = $(git rev-parse A:z/c) &&
+	test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/d) = $(git rev-parse C:y/d) &&
+	test $(git rev-parse HEAD:z/d) = $(git rev-parse C:z/d)
+'
+
 test_done
-- 
2.15.0.5.g9567be9905