Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH 07/11] apply: remove `newfd` from `struct apply_state`

On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 04:56:08PM +0200, Martin Ågren wrote:

> Similar to a previous patch, we do not need to use `newfd` to signal
> that we have a lockfile to clean up. We can just unconditionally call
> `rollback_lock_file`. If we do not hold the lock, it will be a no-op.
> Where we check `newfd` to decide whether we need to take the lock, we
> can instead use `is_lock_file_locked()`.

Looks good. I was surprised you didn't have to replace any writing to
"newfd". But the writing it all happens via write_locked_index(), which
directly accesses the lock's fd member.