Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH] usage: conditionally compile unleak_memory() definition

On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:08:23PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
> If you need to re-roll your 'jk/leak-checkers' branch, could you
> please squash this into the relevant patch (commit c57586d954,
> "add UNLEAK annotation for reducing leak false positives", 05-09-2017).
> This was noticed by sparse, since it is not declared when the
> SUPPRESS_ANNOTATED_LEAKS pre-processor macro is not defined.
> (You could move the declaration out of the #ifdef in the header
> file, I suppose, but it seems pointless to compile the function
> if it isn't being used).

Thanks, that makes sense. There are a handful of other bits to modify in
that final commit, so I will end up with at least one re-roll.