Web lists-archives.com

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] An attempt to move packfile funcs to its own file

Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> What do you mean by "keep the exposed surface area small enough"? If you
> mean the total number of exposed functions in sha1_file and pack (once
> everything is done), I think it will be almost the same as that
> currently in sha1_file.
> ...
> During this patch set, there might be some functions that need to be
> temporarily made global, but those are reverted to static in the end.

That is exactly what I meant.

> As stated above, I don't think so, but I'll make a list of the functions
> needing to be made global.