Re: [PATCH 4/4] imap-send: use curl by default
- Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 19:10:46 +0200
- From: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin <nicolas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] imap-send: use curl by default
Le 07/08/2017 à 18:37, Martin Ågren a écrit :
> On 7 August 2017 at 16:04, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin
> <nicolas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin <nicolas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> imap-send.c | 6 ------
>> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/imap-send.c b/imap-send.c
>> index 90b8683ed..4ebc16437 100644
>> --- a/imap-send.c
>> +++ b/imap-send.c
>> @@ -35,13 +35,7 @@ typedef void *SSL;
>> #include "http.h"
>> -#if defined(USE_CURL_FOR_IMAP_SEND) && defined(NO_OPENSSL)
>> -/* only available option */
>> #define USE_CURL_DEFAULT 1
>> -/* strictly opt in */
>> -#define USE_CURL_DEFAULT 0
>> static int verbosity;
>> static int use_curl = USE_CURL_DEFAULT;
> So this is now basically "static int use_curl = 1;".
> Do we need a compile-time escape-hatch in case someone really needs
> to avoid curl, e.g., because they have a too old version? I suppose
> there is a conceptual difference between the "default", i.e., the value
> of USE_CURL_DEFAULT that is assigned to "use_curl", and the "default
> default", i.e., the value that is normally assigned to USE_CURL_DEFAULT.
The curl code depends on USE_CURL_FOR_IMAP_SEND so even with use_curl == 1, it won't be an issue for people without curl (or old one).
I wasn't sure whether to drop the define or not and figure it might be worth keeping in case in change in the future for some reason.
I don't mind dropping it and hardcofing the default to 1
Also on a side note, I have a case where authentication works with --no-curl but fails withs --curl. Still trying to figure out why.