Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH 1/3] submodule.c: add has_submodules to check if we have any submodules




Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> diff --git a/builtin/fetch.c b/builtin/fetch.c
> index 4ef7a08afc..510ef1c9de 100644
> --- a/builtin/fetch.c
> +++ b/builtin/fetch.c
> @@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ int cmd_fetch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  			set_config_fetch_recurse_submodules(arg);
>  		}
>  		gitmodules_config();
> -		git_config(submodule_config, NULL);
> +		load_submodule_config();
>  	}
>  
> ...
> +static enum {
> +	SUBMODULE_CONFIG_NOT_READ = 0,
> +	SUBMODULE_CONFIG_NO_CONFIG,
> +	SUBMODULE_CONFIG_EXISTS,
> +} submodule_config_reading;
> +
>  /*
>   * The following flag is set if the .gitmodules file is unmerged. We then
>   * disable recursion for all submodules where .git/config doesn't have a
> @@ -83,6 +89,62 @@ int update_path_in_gitmodules(const char *oldpath, const char *newpath)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int submodule_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
> +{
> +	if (!strcmp(var, "submodule.fetchjobs")) {
> +...
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void load_submodule_config(void)
> +{
> +	submodule_config_reading = SUBMODULE_CONFIG_NO_CONFIG;
> +	git_config(submodule_config, NULL);
> +}

OK, so anybody who does the git_config(submodule_config) must
instead call this one, so that we can notice there is some
"submodule" stuff configured.  And that is ensured by making
submodule_config private to this module.

Nicely done.

On a possibly related tangent, I've often found it somewhat
irritating that that these two calls have to go hand-in-hand.

>  		gitmodules_config();
> -		git_config(submodule_config, NULL);

I wonder if it makes sense to roll that gitmodule_config() thing
into this function as well?  

Or do some callsites of load_submodule_config() need to omit call to
gitmodules_config()?  If so please disregard.

Thanks.