Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH v2] builtin/log: honor log.decorate




On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 04:32:14PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> brian m. carlson wrote:
> 
> > The recent change that introduced autodecorating of refs accidentally
> > broke the ability of users to set log.decorate = false to override it.
> 
> Yikes.  It sounds to me like we need a test to ensure we don't regress
> it again later.

I can add one, but it's going to be a bit odd.  The issue is that as far
as I can tell, the option is honored only if it's the last one read, so
it necessarily has to be in the per-repository configuration.

I'm not sure it makes that much sense to add a test for this case.  Do
we generally want to write such tests for all config options?  I don't
suppose it's that common a mistake to make.

Does anyone else have views on whether this is good thing to test for?
-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature