Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules




On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Never mind. git ls-files doesn't support showing files for a specific
>> ancient history. (I guess you'd use ls-tree for that?). I'm guessing
>> we want to run in the actual work-tree for ls-files here.
>>
>> Does "is_submodule_initialized()" going to ensure that we only operate
>> on a submodule that's currently checked out?
>
> I think for that we rather want to use is_submodule_populated.
> And I think it would make sense as well to check for that instead
> of the initialized state.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan

Right ok.

Thanks,
Jake