Re: [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules

Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:05:32 -0700
From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add in a check to see if a submodule is active before attempting to
> recurse.  This prevents 'ls-files' from trying to operate on a submodule
> which may not exist in the working directory.

What would currently happen on recursing into non-active submodules?
Can we have a test for this?

Thanks,
Stefan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules
  - From: Jacob Keller

References:
- [PATCH v2 1/2] ls-files: fix recurse-submodules with nested submodules
  - From: Jacob Keller
- [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules
  - From: Brandon Williams

Prev by Date: Re: Simultaneous gc and repack
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/4] submodule.c: uninitialized submodules are ignored in recursive commands
Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread