Re: [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:05:32 -0700
- From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Add in a check to see if a submodule is active before attempting to > recurse. This prevents 'ls-files' from trying to operate on a submodule > which may not exist in the working directory. What would currently happen on recursing into non-active submodules? Can we have a test for this? Thanks, Stefan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules
- From: Jacob Keller
- Re: [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules
- References:
- [PATCH v2 1/2] ls-files: fix recurse-submodules with nested submodules
- From: Jacob Keller
- [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules
- From: Brandon Williams
- [PATCH v2 1/2] ls-files: fix recurse-submodules with nested submodules
- Prev by Date: Re: Simultaneous gc and repack
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/4] submodule.c: uninitialized submodules are ignored in recursive commands
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules
- Index(es):