Web lists-archives.com

Re: [PATCH] Inconsistency between git log and git rev-parse for ^HEAD^@

Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hello,
> the log and rev-parse commands both support the rev^@ syntax which stands for
> all parents of rev.  The log command also supports ^rev^@ to exclude all of the
> parents of rev, but rev-parse does not.  Should this be fixed?
> If so, the following patch would be a start.

Hmph, would ^A..B and ^A...B also be turned into B..A and B...A in a
similar way?  I think the latter would not make much sense but ^A..B

In any case, accepting ^rev^@ may make sense nevertheless.